Coralbells (Heuchera) Hardiness Research 2009-2010
Dr.
Leonard Perry, University of Vermont
The last decade or two has seen an
explosion of coralbells (Heuchera) on the market, with
little known about their hardiness, particularly under extreme cold climates. Zone ratings are often contradictory, cover a
wide range, and in many cases are conservative, similar to many other new
perennial introductions. One group of coralbells—those with villosa or hairy alumroot
parentage—have been among the more popular of this genus. Growers have raised questions as to their
hardiness, the plants having been bred in France and the west coast, and with
parents from different regions. Native to the southeastern U.S., the species
is often listed as growing in USDA zones 6 to 9. So the purposes of this study were, 1. To field test many new coralbell
introductions in zone 4a for at least two winters, and 2. To perform
controlled freezing studies on potted and overwintered coralbells
of villosa
heritage.
Controlled Freezing Studies
Five cultivars were obtained in
summer 2009, potted into 4-inch square pots, and grown through fall outdoors in
northern Vermont under 40 percent shade.
Plants were then moved in early November into a double-glazed rigid poly
house with 75 percent shade (from a heat curtain inside and white poly covering
outside), where soil temperatures were maintained at an average 40°F, with a
range of 36° to 44°F. Occasionally
temperatures would go higher for a few hours on sunny days, reaching 54°F, or for a
few hours during cold nights to 28 to 30°F for a few hours in early
morning.
Plants were placed into controlled
temperature freezers on two dates, December 11, 2009 and February 6, 2010. On each date, plants were allowed to drop to
28°F and become uniformly frozen over 2 days.
Then they were dropped to each target temperature (23°F, 18°F, 13°F, and
9°F) over a roughly two hour period, and allowed to remain at those
temperatures for a half hour, before removing one set of plants and proceeding
to the next temperature. This procedure
is the same as has been used for previous such hardiness studies we’ve
conducted over the past 20 years. Plants
were then removed and allowed to return to greenhouse temperatures, and grown
on. They were rated and moved outside in
early April. Ratings were based on
relative percent growth, both previous and new. There were 6 replicate plants
of each cultivar, for each temperature.
Within each cultivar, data was analyzed statistically using Analysis of Variance, with means separated if differences existed by Tukey’s procedure.
Each cultivar was frozen in the same
freezer to eliminate variability between freezers. Two cultivars were in one freezer, three in
the other. On the second freezing date
in February, one freezer had an unexplained and abnormal sudden drop in
temperature after initial freezing.
Temperatures dropped below 18° and 13°F, so data were not available for
these temperatures for Frosted Violet, Mocha, and Tiramisu. The quicker than
normal drop also may have affected the 23°F results. Instead, temperatures were held below 13°F for
either 18 or 24 hours. No plants survived either of these extreme
treatments. These were extreme, as
plants would seldom if ever experience such extremes in the field or in
pots. In the field, over almost two
decades of winter soil measurements in USDA zone 4a, temperatures haven’t
dropped below 28°F, and seldom go
below 30°F. Past studies, and discussions with growers,
indicate that even in cold climates, pot temperatures in unheated overwintering
houses, when pots are on the ground, don’t drop below 21°F to 23°F during extreme
events. Of course this may vary with
snow cover outside, and type of greenhouse
coverings.
Coralbells (Heuchera villosa) ratings after Controlled Freezing
1=dead,
3=saleable, 5=excellent regrowth
Statistics:
NS=no significant differences, p=significance level, MSE=Mean Square error
measure of variability; where significance, those numbers within a row,
followed by the same letter, are not significantly different.
|
Cultivar |
date |
-2°C/ 28°F |
-5°C/ 23°F |
-8°C/ 18°F |
-11°C/ 13°F |
-14°C/ 9°F |
statistics |
|
Blackout |
Dec. |
5.0 |
4.8 |
4.3 |
4.3 |
3.5 |
NS,
p=0.07, MSE=0.3 |
|
|
Feb. |
4.3ab |
5.0a |
3.8ab |
3.2bc |
1.7c |
P<0.001,
MSE=0.3 |
|
Caramel |
Dec. |
5.0a |
4.2ab |
2.8bc |
3.5abc |
2.2c |
P<0.001,
MSE=0.5 |
|
|
Feb. |
4.5a |
4.7a |
2.7b |
1.0c |
1.5b |
P<0.001,
MSE=0.3 |
|
Frosted
Violet |
Dec. |
4.8a |
4.7a |
4.7a |
3.2ab |
2.0b |
P<0.001,
MSE=0.2 |
|
|
Feb. |
4.5a |
2.0b |
-- |
-- |
1.0b |
P<0.001,
MSE=0.2 |
|
Mocha |
Dec. |
4.8a |
4.7a |
4.8a |
3.3b |
2.7b |
P<0.001,
MSE=0.2 |
|
|
Feb. |
4.5a |
3.8a |
-- |
-- |
1.3b |
P<0.001,
MSE=0.3 |
|
Tiramisu |
Dec. |
3.5 |
3.0 |
3.5 |
3.5 |
2.0 |
NS,
P=0.04, MSE=0.4 |
|
|
Feb. |
4.7a |
3.2b |
-- |
-- |
1.0c |
P<0.001,
MSE=0.1 |
Several
overall observations from these studies were:
It
appears there may be a difference among freezing dates in winter, plants
perhaps slightly more hardy and able to withstand low temperatures in
mid-December than mid-February. Most
were able to withstand a brief (2 hour) exposure to 23°F and still have good regrowth. When fully
hardened, they were able to withstand much lower (13°F) and still be saleable. It would be interesting to see how long at
each of these temperatures plants would recover similarly, only being at these
target temperatures for a half hour in this study.
It
was surprising, given questions raised by growers and from earlier field
plantings, of this hardiness. The
difference and performance of the best—Blackout, and the poorest—Tiramisu, was
not surprising given earlier field trials.
Although a couple were the most hardy of the cultivars after the first
freezing, it would be interesting had there been data from the second freezing
to see if they were as hardy then. Five
different cultivars will be frozen similarly during winter 2010-2011, and the
results compared to these initial five.
All will then be compared to two years of field results.
Field Trials
Just
over two dozen cultivars were planted in the field in a stony loam, in early
fall 2008. Although listed in zone 4a,
both winters barely got below -20°F so were in reality 4b. Water was given for establishment, and as
needed during dry periods, and compost side-dressed yearly along with 5-3-4 in early
summer, otherwise minimal care was given to similar a home situation and to
maximize plant stress. This seems
verified by the fact that three cultivars that didn’t survive the first year in
the field trials did survive fine in landscape beds receiving more attention. Snow cover was adequate, with winter soil
temperatures seldom dropping to, or much below, 30°F. Of these initial plantings, 12 died after the
first winter, and 14 survived both winters (see ratings below), and one died
after the second winter. Of those that
died, as many as were available are being tried a second winter. The survivors will be continued, along with a
second season for 40 additional cultivars, with more added. Of those surviving and rating highest, the
most vigorous, with excellent and best flower display, was Silver Lode.
Field
survival ratings of Coralbells after 2 winters
(2008-2010) in USDA zone 4b in Vermont.
Ratings were 1=just living to 3=excellent, d=died
after second winter.
|
Cultivar |
rating |
|
Amethyst
Mist |
1.5 |
|
Autumn
Bride |
2 |
|
Bronze
Wave |
2 |
|
Dolce
Creme de Menthe |
3 |
|
Dolce
Licorice |
3 |
|
Dolce
Mocha Mint |
2.5 |
|
Georgia
Peach |
1 |
|
Ginger
Ale |
1.5 |
|
Green
Ivory |
3 |
|
Mahogany |
d |
|
Mocha |
2.5 |
|
Obsidian |
3 |
|
Purple
Petticoats |
3 |
|
Silver
Lode |
3 |
|
Starry
Night |
2.5 |
Several other cultivars died after one year and are
currently under retrial; 40 additional cultivars have only been tested for one
year.
Appreciation is expressed to the New Hampshire Horticulture Endowment, and to North Creek Nurseries (Landenberg, PA), for their support and making this study possible.
Return to Perry's Perennial Pages | Sustainable Research